Submarine builder Peter Madsen Googled beheading and girl the light before cutting off correspondents head, Danish field is told

Just a few hours before launching on his momentous submarine journey with Swedish correspondent Kim Wall, Peter Madsen worried that he lacked the self-control to face a slaying trial.

” He talked about how he needed to learn to shut up because he had difficulty stopping things to himself ,” Australian programme make Emma Sullivan told the Copenhagen district court last-place month, referring to an interrogation she filmed that summertime afternoon with the Danish rocket and submarine builder.

If he were, for instance, to become the primary accused for the assassination of his neighbour’s partner, he supposed he would find it hard to keep quiet, although he has knew he was entitled not to comment, and that anything he responded was likely to be used against him.

When Danish prosecutor Jakob Buch-Jepsen summing-up up the first 10 daytimes of Madsen’s trial for murdering Wall on Monday, the 47 -year-old is likely to discover how right he was in that self-assessment. The first thing he said in tribunal when the visitation began at the start of last month, after denying that he assassinated Wall, appeared to reveal the” egotistical traits” forensic analysts had identified.

” “Theres anything” worse that can happen to a person like me ,” he answered of the fearful extinction and dismemberment of the talented 30 -year-old journalist.” The time Kim Wall died, there was nothing left for me to fight for .”

The case has gripped Denmark and Sweden, with at least six newspapers and broadcasters live-blogging every minute of the trouble.” Everyone follows it ,” responds Anna Gottschalk, who flooded the contest most daytimes for the Berlingske newspaper.” It doesn’t matter if you’re at a coffeehouse or their own families birthday, everyone knows this case .”

The interest has also been international. The courtroom had to open a special office with a video link to accommodate more than 115 writers from 15 countries, move by the unusual suppose, with his rocket-building campaigns, and the gruesome circumstances of Wall’s death on his submarine.

Buch-Jepsen conceives Madsen suffocated or beheaded Wall after torturing her to fulfil a murderous sexual delusion. The prosecutor read out and played a selection of more than 140 excerpts or ties depicting assassination, anguish, beheading and the sex torturing of women that were found by police on Madsen’s computer, hard drives and amongst the rebuilt contents of his iPhone. The light before Wall’s death, he Googled “beheading” and “girl”, and then watched a video of a girl having her throat slit.

But when Madsen passed his own accounting to seeing how Wall died from asphyxiation after an accident stimulated the submarine to fill with exhaust fumes, he was so conceivable that it was easy to see how he had convinced so many people that he could launch a manned opening assignment from a rust-brown hangar in a disused Copenhagen shipyard.

When Buch-Jepsen predicted part of a textbook found on one of Madsen’s hard drives about torturing women around skewers, the accused conserved it was no differently constituted a fright movie.” Of course it’s crazy ,” Madsen alleged, ignoring the chilling parallels between the contents and the weaves on Wall’s body.” It’s as crazy as the movie you’ve seen, Seven . It’s the same as cinemas you’ve seen, Jakob .”

Cross-examined on how and why he cut off Wall’s limbs, legs and psyche, Madsen initially showed subjugated, announcing it” a terribly, very traumatic happen, which I do not want to describe “. Eventually he declared he had no idea why it had been necessary to cut off Wall’s head to remove her body from the submarine.

Kim Winther, an expert witness from the Danish Technological Institute, had told the court that Madsen’s account of the accident was technically “plausible”, and questioned the claim make use of a submarine expert that marks of carbon monoxide or soot would inevitably have been found in the submarine and its filters if his account was true.

The fact that forensic pathologists have been unable to determine the exact time or case of Wall’s death could also be a problem for the prosecution. However, Mette Grith Stage, who has protected some of Denmark’s most high-profile assassins, told the Observer that the defence faced” an uphill struggle “.” It doesn’t make it all very well when he has all information materials on his computer ,” she said.

The forensic pathologist knew no mansions of carbon monoxide gas poisoning on Wall’s body, and determined that some of her weaves were inflicted when she was alive, or very shortly after death, rather than many hours later, as Madsen claims.

The biggest problem for the defence, Stage mentioned, was Madsen’s own shifting testimony, which has moved from a claim that he plunged Wall on ground alive, to saying that she died when a ponderous hatch fell on her front, to articulating she died of asphyxiation.” In a bag like this where you don’t have any witness, it’s very important that the defendant is trustworthy, and he was in the beginning ,” Stage replied.” But each time the police came up with something new, he had to make a brand-new excuse, and this has happened so many times that he’s not trustworthy any more .”

The verdict is due on Wednesday.

Read more: http :// www.theguardian.com/ us